Tier_1_Ontological_Substrate
Tier 1: Ontological Substrate (O1.x)
Type: 🏛️ Foundational
Scope: The Nature of Reality
Dependencies: Tier 0
O1.1 — REALITY IS COMPOSED OF INFORMATIONAL STATES, NOT SUBSTANCE
Type: 🟢 Primitive (ontological commitment)
Scope: Ontology, Metaphysics, Physics interface
Dependencies: M0.1, M0.3
Refutation Targets: Category error · Reduction success · Ontic remainder
| CORE CLAIM | STRONGEST OBJECTION | DIRECT RESPONSE | GROUNDS (SUPPORT) | DEEPEST — REFUTATION TARGETS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reality consists of informational states, not material substance | “You are denying substance realism; this collapses into anti-realism.” | Denying substance ≠ denying reality. States are real even if no substratum exists beneath them. | Modern physics does not posit substance—only state spaces, operators, and relations. There is no experimentally accessible ‘bare matter’. | Defeat A (Ontic remainder): Identify a measurable, irreducible substrate beneath state descriptions.Defeat B (Reduction): Reduce informational states fully to non-informational primitives. |
| There is no ontologically primitive “stuff” | “States must be states of something.” | That intuition assumes Aristotelian substance metaphysics. χ-grounded ontology allows state-without-substrate as primitive. | Quantum fields are not “things” but mathematical structures with excitations. GR spacetime is geometry, not substance. | Defeat: Show state-without-substrate is incoherent or inconsistent when formalized. |
O1.2 — DIFFERENCE (DISTINCTION) IS ONTOLOGICALLY PRIMITIVE
Type: 🟢 Primitive
Scope: Ontology, Logic, Information
Dependencies: M0.1
Refutation Targets: Collapse to identity · Circularity · Non-instantiability
| CORE CLAIM | STRONGEST OBJECTION | DIRECT RESPONSE | GROUNDS (SUPPORT) | DEEPEST — REFUTATION TARGETS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To exist is to differ | “Difference presupposes identity; you are reversing the order.” | Identity is definable only via invariance across differences. Difference is ontologically prior. | Information theory: no information without distinguishable states. Physics: observables require contrast. | Defeat A: Show identity can be defined without reference to difference.Defeat B: Provide an ontologically meaningful but distinction-free entity. |
| Absolute sameness implies non-being | “You’re redefining existence linguistically.” | This is not linguistic but structural: no difference → no state → no dynamics → no observables. | A universe with no distinctions is indistinguishable from nothing. | Defeat: Demonstrate a physically or logically coherent system with no distinctions but nontrivial behavior. |
O1.3 — CHANGE IS FUNDAMENTAL, TIME IS DERIVED
Type: 🟢 Primitive
Scope: Ontology, Physics, Temporality
Dependencies: O1.2
Refutation Targets: Temporal necessity · Static ontology · Circular definition
| CORE CLAIM | STRONGEST OBJECTION | DIRECT RESPONSE | GROUNDS (SUPPORT) | DEEPEST — REFUTATION TARGETS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change is primitive; time is a bookkeeping parameter | “Time is fundamental; change happens in time.” | That reverses dependence. Time is defined as an ordering of changes, not their cause. | Relational time in GR; Wheeler–DeWitt equation lacks time; time emerges from correlations. | Defeat A: Show time can be defined without reference to change.Defeat B: Produce a changeless system with intrinsic time evolution. |
O1.4 — POSSIBILITY SPACE IS REAL (NOT MERELY CONCEPTUAL)
Type: 🔵 Schema
Scope: Ontology, Modality, Quantum interpretation
Dependencies: O1.1, O1.2
Refutation Targets: Modal collapse · Epistemic-only possibility · Overgeneration
| CORE CLAIM | STRONGEST OBJECTION | DIRECT RESPONSE | GROUNDS (SUPPORT) | DEEPEST — REFUTATION TARGETS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possibility space is ontically real | “Possibilities are just descriptions of ignorance.” | That fails in systems where unactualized possibilities affect outcomes. | Quantum superposition and interference depend on unrealized paths. | Defeat A: Reproduce quantum interference with purely epistemic probabilities.Defeat B: Show possibility space has no causal or constraining role. |
Section Navigation & Dependencies
You are here: §2.1 — Tier 1: Ontological Substrate
Purpose of this section:
Defines the kind of "something" reality is made of, prioritizing difference, change, and real possibility over static substance.
⟶ Forward Progression
Next: §2.2 — Tier 2: Information Dynamics
This section depends on the following prior commitments:
- §2.0 — Tier 0: Primordial Existence
- §1.1 — Paper 1: Information Primacy
⛨ Defense & Scope Control
Primary objections addressed:
→ §9.1 — Falsifying the Ontological Core
What this section does not claim:
- That matter is an illusion (only that it is derivative)
- That time does not exist (only that it is derived from change)
Claim type: Foundational
Testability standard: Logical coherence / Ontological necessity
Reading Guidance
This section locks the "what" of reality. If state-without-substrate is rejected, the entire information-first derivation fails.