This document provides pre-emptive responses to common misunderstandings of the Theophysics framework. Each objection is met with a structural refutation based on the core axioms.

Simulation Theory assumes a physical "computer" (hardware) running code (software). Theophysics posits that Information is the Hardware. There is no machine behind the curtain; there is only the Logos (χ).

Conclusion: We are not inside a computer; we are inside a Speech. A simulation is a copy of a reality; Theophysics describes the Ground of Reality.

This framework does not use "Information" or "Coherence" as metaphors. We use them as measurable variables with identical mathematical roles in both physics and moral dynamics (e.g., Sin = measurable noise injection).

Conclusion: We are not translating theology into science; we are demonstrating that both describe the exact same informational constraints.

We do not appeal to God to explain a "gap" in data (like the missing link). We appeal to the Logos to explain the Logic itself. As Gödel proved, every system requires an outside truth to validate its internal consistency.

Conclusion: This is not "God of the Gaps"; it is God of the Ground. We are explaining the foundation, not the holes in the wall.

Every system of thought eventually terminates in an unproven axiom (Gödel). Circularity is only "vicious" if it occurs within the system. At the base of the system, self-grounding is a mathematical necessity to avoid infinite regress.

Conclusion: You either accept a self-grounding Start (χ) or you accept an infinite chain of "nothing." One is an explanation; the other is a surrender.