χ Faith thru Physics
Math Layer
← Prev
Article Classification
Next →

THE ENTROPIC SOCIETY

Technology, Obsolescence, and Moral Decline
Read Aloud
0:00
Deep Dive
0:00
Podcast
0:00
Critique
0:00

Works Cited

[1] “What Is Philosophy of Technology?” sfu.ca

[2] “Philosophy of Technology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

[3] “90 Years of Tech Adoption Rates.” DataTrek Research

[4] “Disconnection and Reorganization: The Transformation of Civic Life.” University of Miami

[5] “Internet, Broadband Fact Sheet.” Pew Research Center

[6] “From 2005 to 2010.” OCLC

[7] “Social Media and Youth Mental Health.” HHS.gov

[8] “How Can Consumers Develop Aesthetic Durability?” Sustainability Directory

[9] “Obsolescence.” Harvard Design Magazine

[10] “Aesthetic of Entropy: An Architectural Archetype.” Scientific.Net

[11] “Home Alone: More Than A Quarter of All Households Have One Person.” Census Bureau

[12] “Divorce: More than a Century of Change, 1900–2022.” BGSU NCFMR

[13] “Public Trust in Government: 1958–2024.” Pew Research

[14] “Public Trust in Government: 1958–2025.” Pew Research

[15] “Trust in Media at New Low of 28%.” Gallup

[16] “The Trust Project.” thetrustproject.org

[17] “Depression Prevalence in Adolescents and Adults.” CDC

[18] “Data and Statistics on Children’s Mental Health.” CDC

[19] “One in Three Americans Feels Lonely Every Week.” APA

[20] “Nation Suffering from Stress of Societal Division, Loneliness.” APA

[21] “Vital and Health Statistics.” CDC

[22] “Social Media and Mental Health in Children and Teens.” Johns Hopkins

[23] “Social media use increases depression and loneliness.” Penn Today

[24] “Tech causes more problems than it solves.” Pew Research

[26] “High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization.” PNAS Nexus

[27] “Is America in Moral Decline?” Columbia Magazine

Final Audit

Every page ends with the same three-part check: what we got right, what we overstated, and what we got wrong.

Epistemic covenant: we present these claims as openly, fairly, and truthfully as we can. The evidence can be checked, the mechanisms can be challenged, the proof burden is named. Where the work moves from how the science behaves to why it means something, the choice is stated. We think the pattern is worth believing, but we will not hide where faith begins.

What We Got Right

  • Load-bearing claims, clear definitions, and the parts that clearly survived the check.

What We Overstated

  • Strong direction, but the language ran ahead of the evidence or the proof.

What We Got Wrong

  • Claims that need correction, tightening, or weaker formulation.
Proof & Research
The Math Behind the Claims

Master Equation

10 variables

Isomorphisms

38 mappings

Proof Explorer

Claims + grades

Rigor Cards

Bible + MDA

Lean 4 Proofs

267 theorems

Reference & Media
Everything Else

Glossary

300+ terms

Media Gallery

Visuals + slides

Podcast

Episodes + feed

Audio Library

TTS + narration

Paper Grader

NLP scoring

χ = f(G, M, E, S, T, K, R, Q, F, C)

Faith Through Physics · David Lowe · 2026

Plant the Flag · POF 2828

(c) 2024–2026 David Lowe — Faith Through Physics

"The truth will defend itself. Your job is to say it clearly."

15 + 15 = 100
Our inputs don't match our outputs. That's the point.