{ "generated_at": "2026-05-30T07:20:25", "source": "mda_math_translation_full61_20260530_053137 claim-audit CSVs", "raw_claim_candidates": 442, "promoted_claim_count": 5, "selection_rule": "claim_maturity_level >= 3 and at least 4 of 6 Q1-Q6 gates pass; personal/testimonial statements are labeled separately, not promoted as framework proof by default.", "series_packet_href": "../../03-moral-decline/_MDA_PRODUCTION_ARCHITECTURE_DRAFT_20260525-101649/proof-packet/MDA-series-proof-packet.html", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "MDA-CLAIM-C8822F5B81", "paper_id": "MDA-004-facts-framework", "section": "7.2 Falsification Protocol", "status": "SURVIVES", "claim": "This paper can be destroyed by any of the following: | # | Kill Condition | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | Find a major domain showing *increasing* coherence 1965–2025 without external constraint intervention | Not yet found | | 2 | Demonstrate the curve convergence is statistical artifact (selection bias, normalization error) | Replication invited | | 3 | Produce an alternative model that predicts cross-domain synchronization with fewer assumptions | Not yet proposed | | 4 | Show the inflection point is an artifact of data availability, not real behavioral change | Addressed via pre-1945 data | | 5 | Replicate with independent datasets and find no convergence | Replication invited | Explicit Invitation: If you can satisfy any kill condition, this paper is falsified.", "claim_layer": "EVIDENCE_PROOF", "claim_maturity_label": "Empirical Support", "claim_maturity_level": "6", "forward_score": "6", "evidence_summary": "Detected terms: model, coherence", "evidence_bar": "data", "forward_test": "If the claim is true, its stated prediction should survive measurement or comparison.", "reverse_test": "If the pattern can appear without the proposed framework, the claim should be downgraded or narrowed.", "kill_conditions": "Sentence contains an explicit falsifiability or prediction marker; preserve it and make the failure case concrete.", "proof_boundary": "Current boundary: deterministic pass classifies this as Empirical Support, not a final proof.", "q1_identity": "clear", "q2_scope": "bounded", "q3_mechanism": "present", "q4_evidence": "present", "q5_falsifiability": "present", "q6_boundary": "present", "q7_listener_risk": "normal", "article_href": "../../03-moral-decline/html/MDA-004-facts-framework.html", "scorecard_href": "mda-scorecards/PI_MDA-004-facts-framework.html", "stable_locator": { "paper_id": "MDA-004-facts-framework", "section": "7.2 Falsification Protocol", "claim_sha1": "929c949e1e8328c053be297503bd0e5bd23cfd9c" } }, { "claim_id": "MDA-CLAIM-783761106C", "paper_id": "MDA-045-amish-control-group-THE-DATA", "section": "Sexual Abuse and Domestic Violence", "status": "SURVIVES", "claim": "Structural factors that enable this: * Patriarchal authority structures * Theology of forgiveness that pressures victims to reconcile * Cultural reluctance to involve “English” law enforcement * Limited access to outside support services * No reliable prevalence data because reporting rates are extremely low **No system built on human authority is immune to the abuse of that authority.** The Amish binding variable (external authority/Ordnung) constrains entropy — but when the authority itself becomes the source of harm, the system’s own design impedes correction.", "claim_layer": "FRAMEWORK_FORMAL", "claim_maturity_label": "Structural Correspondence", "claim_maturity_level": "3", "forward_score": "5", "evidence_summary": "Detected terms: entropy", "evidence_bar": "data, source", "forward_test": "If the claim is true, the described pattern should appear where the paper says it should appear.", "reverse_test": "If the pattern can appear without the proposed framework, the claim should be downgraded or narrowed.", "kill_conditions": "Needs an explicit failure case: what observation, logic result, or counterexample would make this claim false?", "proof_boundary": "Current boundary: deterministic pass classifies this as Structural Correspondence, not a final proof.", "q1_identity": "clear", "q2_scope": "bounded", "q3_mechanism": "present", "q4_evidence": "present", "q5_falsifiability": "missing", "q6_boundary": "present", "q7_listener_risk": "normal", "article_href": "../../03-moral-decline/MDA-045-amish-control-group-THE-DATA.html", "scorecard_href": "mda-scorecards/PI_MDA-045-amish-control-group-THE-DATA.html", "stable_locator": { "paper_id": "MDA-045-amish-control-group-THE-DATA", "section": "Sexual Abuse and Domestic Violence", "claim_sha1": "6412b332074619659365acddfb243838fc0d29ab" } }, { "claim_id": "MDA-CLAIM-2337B31BBC", "paper_id": "MDA-054-way-back", "section": "KC-4: Superior alternative model", "status": "SURVIVES", "claim": "If a competing model explains the same data with equal or greater predictive accuracy, fewer parameters, and a different causal mechanism, our model should be replaced. **Status: Not challenged.", "claim_layer": "EVIDENCE_PROOF", "claim_maturity_label": "Empirical Support", "claim_maturity_level": "6", "forward_score": "5", "evidence_summary": "Detected terms: model", "evidence_bar": "data", "forward_test": "If the claim is true, its stated prediction should survive measurement or comparison.", "reverse_test": "If the pattern can appear without the proposed framework, the claim should be downgraded or narrowed.", "kill_conditions": "Sentence contains an explicit falsifiability or prediction marker; preserve it and make the failure case concrete.", "proof_boundary": "Current boundary: deterministic pass classifies this as Empirical Support, not a final proof.", "q1_identity": "implicit", "q2_scope": "bounded", "q3_mechanism": "present", "q4_evidence": "present", "q5_falsifiability": "present", "q6_boundary": "present", "q7_listener_risk": "normal", "article_href": "../../03-moral-decline/MDA-054-way-back.html", "scorecard_href": "mda-scorecards/PI_MDA-054-way-back.html", "stable_locator": { "paper_id": "MDA-054-way-back", "section": "KC-4: Superior alternative model", "claim_sha1": "392cdae8f678feaf0bbe991ac9b5856bb8e89d39" } }, { "claim_id": "MDA-CLAIM-165B2C231E", "paper_id": "MDA-902-appendix-trans-domain-analysis", "section": "SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE MODEL", "status": "SURVIVES", "claim": "If a competing model explains the same data with equal or greater predictive accuracy, fewer parameters, and a different causal mechanism, our model should be replaced.", "claim_layer": "EVIDENCE_PROOF", "claim_maturity_label": "Empirical Support", "claim_maturity_level": "6", "forward_score": "5", "evidence_summary": "Detected terms: model", "evidence_bar": "data", "forward_test": "If the claim is true, its stated prediction should survive measurement or comparison.", "reverse_test": "If the pattern can appear without the proposed framework, the claim should be downgraded or narrowed.", "kill_conditions": "Sentence contains an explicit falsifiability or prediction marker; preserve it and make the failure case concrete.", "proof_boundary": "Current boundary: deterministic pass classifies this as Empirical Support, not a final proof.", "q1_identity": "implicit", "q2_scope": "bounded", "q3_mechanism": "present", "q4_evidence": "present", "q5_falsifiability": "present", "q6_boundary": "present", "q7_listener_risk": "normal", "article_href": "../../03-moral-decline/MDA-902-appendix-trans-domain-analysis.html", "scorecard_href": "mda-scorecards/PI_MDA-902-appendix-trans-domain-analysis.html", "stable_locator": { "paper_id": "MDA-902-appendix-trans-domain-analysis", "section": "SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE MODEL", "claim_sha1": "c9e775afd645d418cebd03233f4489b248d56e87" } }, { "claim_id": "MDA-CLAIM-AAE082B1E4", "paper_id": "MDA-906-appendix-93-year-floor", "section": "Modern Average", "status": "SURVIVES_WITH_REPAIRS", "claim": "When a mathematical model, a three-thousand-year-old text, and modern epidemiological data all independently point at the same region of the number line, you are not looking at coincidence.", "claim_layer": "FRAMEWORK_FORMAL", "claim_maturity_label": "Formal Model", "claim_maturity_level": "4", "forward_score": "4", "evidence_summary": "Detected terms: model", "evidence_bar": "data", "forward_test": "If the claim is true, the described pattern should appear where the paper says it should appear.", "reverse_test": "If the pattern can appear without the proposed framework, the claim should be downgraded or narrowed.", "kill_conditions": "Needs an explicit failure case: what observation, logic result, or counterexample would make this claim false?", "proof_boundary": "Current boundary: deterministic pass classifies this as Formal Model, not a final proof.", "q1_identity": "clear", "q2_scope": "bounded", "q3_mechanism": "missing", "q4_evidence": "present", "q5_falsifiability": "missing", "q6_boundary": "present", "q7_listener_risk": "normal", "article_href": "../../03-moral-decline/MDA-906-appendix-93-year-floor.html", "scorecard_href": "mda-scorecards/PI_MDA-906-appendix-93-year-floor.html", "stable_locator": { "paper_id": "MDA-906-appendix-93-year-floor", "section": "Modern Average", "claim_sha1": "5ff705e7fda81d92a06c8a2cca60ea8ab73eae8a" } } ] }